newseed

I like the site. I am wondering how you are going to get all those pages in flash to index on Google/Yahoo. :/

And what is the purpose for using such tactic? It doesn't make sense.

In the near future... "Wow! Look at this site! Cool! Let's view the source, copy it and use it on our site." *click* *windows pops up* "If you wish to view the source, you must provide your international registered web surfing ID and password"

I strongly recommend taking your site out of frames and use server side includes instead. Search Engines and Frames

I've personally never used but I hear nothing but good stuff saying that it's relatively easy to learn. I don't know how the code is and how easy or difficult it is to customize it to fit the store's needs.

This one and this one but I don't know the cost for either. The other option is to find a property management software that has renting capabilities. Of course you will need to customize the language to fit the business that you intend to use it for.

Pretty nifty. I haven't really messed with it much but does it allow you to change speed, transitions, etc?

You have made 4 posts and you have presented nothing new in any of them. You even made a post about tags in which you gave incorrect information. @Moderators: SPAM???

You are presenting old information that you can find here on this forum already. Do you have anything new...fresh...upcoming??

Why not get a part of the so-called 'Bail Out' program instead of selling your post. You'd have a better chance of getting rich!!

You will need to double check the db name and username. On my server, both are the same.

They may have agreed but your design is still up on their site.

Simple solution would be continue to allow MS to have IE as the default but also install at least 3 other major browser (not a link to install them) in which icons are displayed on the desktop. Think about it. It's their OS. It's not their fault if they know how to market their product. If we don't like it...don't buy it. It's as simple and as difficult as that.

I've found this on Google but it really doesn't go into specifics about text-indent and if it falls in the lines of hiding text regardless what's it meant for.

I know that Google will penalize sites using techniques to hide text but is visible for search engines. I'd never heard of doing this before but a client requested this kind of technique where they would use text-indent: -9999px to move it off the screen. This seem old school and not advised to use. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks.

...and another. That one is more detailed and quite informative.

Another one and also this one.

What a dip they are. Spam the suckers! Really, not much you can do. Another discussion here.

Both. Don't let this discourage you. Open yourself up to a new way of thinking of web design and coding. Also, post your questions in the forums to help you build achieve the 'perfect' look you are looking for. Improvements usually comes by trial and error.

You should start because what you are presenting is not living up to the company name you have chosen. Then why add the email address on there is the first place? -Faster page loading -Lowered hosting costs -Redesigns are more efficient -Redesigns are less expensive -Visual consistency maintained throughout website(s) -Better for SEO -Accessibility -Competitive edge (job security) -Quick website-wide updates -Easier for teams to maintain (and individuals) -Increased usability -More complex layouts and designs -No spacer gifs 'virtual' is correct. One mockup of the design. Splice only the portion you need and use css to achieve the same visual look. Create only one html layout and css to suit. Once that is done then it becomes super easy and fast to create the remaining pages. Correct but using text in the links improves it. Besides, adding/modifying the link is easier and faster. You just use the image (without the text) as a background and put your text over it. You have a long way to go because you are not up to speed in web design. I'm not trying to insult you. I'm just being upfront and direct. I prefer the hard truth rather than soft opinions.

Try this: The HTML: ></pre> <ul id="navlist"> Frames By OSWM DOS By Richard O Robinson Gears Of War By Richard O Robinson The Greener Side By Shane Jeffers Moment of Zen By One|Te Productions Add To The Garden The only thing I did to the above code is remove the tags. Don't need if you set the to display block because you are defining an for each line you want. The CSS: #navlist { list-style: none; } #navlist li { display: inline; float: left; } #navlist li a { color: green; display: block; padding: 3px 15px; margin: 0; } #navlist li a:hover { text-decoration: none; } Two important elements here is that I added float: left to the #navlist li and display: block to #navlist a. Of course I've added a bit of padding/margins to give it a nice look.

http://www.serie3.info/s3slider/ I believe there is another version of this somewhere but I can't recall the bookmark or where I saw this.

If you are going to use the name Flawless you better live up to it because: -You page does not validate - BAD CHOICE! What do you have that requires frames? -You used tables -Embedded all your css styles in the -Email address is exposed for email harvesters (spammers) -Important text embedded into images is bad for SEO -Underlining text that are not links (will make people think they are links but they really are not) -The earth background is not transparent enough causing difficulties to read the text -Poor contrast ~ The green inline links is not good for either white or black background and it's not the same font size as the rest of the text -Overuse of images thus you are not using the css background repeat -Top menu links are images ~ Poor for SEO Overall, the design is okay but certainly not flawless looking. It's time to get away from ImageReady splicing your site together and start getting your eyes and hands into the code and code it yourself.

Don't ask me why and maybe you are right about the javascript but the cell that has the paragraph text somehow wanted to have a width assigned to it. It now works...I just need to move all the inline styles over to the css file. Thanks for looking into it.