robbie71321 Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 I am wondering which is better for search optimisation: 1. Pages with a lot of the PHP "Include" commmand to provide the menus & the content or 2. Full HTML pages without any PHP Option 1. is preferred but i'm wondering if the search engines will "see" all the "files" that contain the content. Quote
newseed Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Server Side Inlcudes using either PHP or ASP will be rendered when the visitor visits a page. So option 1 is the right choice because it will render just like option 2 as far as what google and yahoo sees. You can simply test this by display your web page with the php includes and then do a View Source via your browser. This is what search engines sees. Quote
robbie71321 Posted March 2, 2009 Author Report Posted March 2, 2009 Thanks Newseed, You explained it perfectly and I did the test , Excellent!! Quote
LSW Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 There is no better as, as mentioned, the result is the same as the SE will see HTML. But No. 1 although not better for SEO, is easier on the developer and maintainer of the site. Quote
jlhaslip Posted March 2, 2009 Report Posted March 2, 2009 Have the best of both worlds... html pages produced by php scripting and use mod_rewrite for fancy URL's so it looks like an html page. Lots of CMS softwares use this approach. check out sNews, Joomla, Drupal et al. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.