Jump to content

virtual

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    876
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by virtual

  1. Also you don't need to add px after 0. Zero is zero whatever the measurement.
  2. On the Mac you can also use "Apple Key - Shift - 4" and then hold mouse key down and drag over the area you want to capture.
  3. Me too, I haven't actually timed it but there definitely is a wait period.
  4. ff3 on Mac and there is a wait time.
  5. I am no expert, but I am a great researcher, I found this for you IE6 doesn't hover on anything other than a's without either Javascript or the fake tables that Stu Nichols uses. So, to get the dropdowns to work you'll need either a: the Suckerfish Javascript (and add the little classes to your CSS sheet) as seen here: http://www.htmldog.com/articles/suckerfish/dropdowns/ or b: stick an .htc file on your server which also is Javascript but tells IE6 to hover on anything you want hovered... webpage: http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html actual file: http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/htc/csshover2.htc In the drop down menu I used with the htc file, the conditional comment for IE6 had absolutely to be placed just before the closing . I hope this helps, this project seems to be as you say a major pain in IE6. P.S. The pngfix does not work on the other pages either because the paths to the fix are the same as on the index page
  6. Haven't had time to look on IE6 for the other problems but your path to the png fix is different on the ww w.koo lertek.com/computer-parts/pc/viewCategories.asp page On the ww w.koo lertek.com/ page you have the following: src="/computer-parts/pc/scripts/pngfix/supersleight.js" on the ww w.koo lertek.com/computer-parts/pc/viewCategories.asp page you have src="scripts/pngfix/supersleight.js
  7. I think Eric means something like this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1631924/preventing-onclick-page-jumps
  8. @Tanya From a design and usability point of view it is not a good idea to have 4 sets of different colours for the different link states on your page. It will be confusing to the user and visually garish. Consistency in a web page is a must for the above mentioned reasons.
  9. That is a default for links, so you probably have not set a different colour or text-decoration:none in your css for your different link states.
  10. It is difficult to guess what is going on without seeing any code. Post a link to your page. It sounds like your div bar is not big enough to hold the buttons with their margins and padding.
  11. You would have to make a graphic in Photoshop for that and your div, if it is big, would not be expandable. If it is just a button then it would still have to be a graphic.
  12. And how about me? I've become something of a regular around here and also have to wait the required 3 minutes....
  13. Glad to hear it, how much longer do you think we will have to put up with IE6?????
  14. Did you add the META tag or the HTML file that you must for them to verify your site?
  15. Well I hope Bill Gates reads this and implements it!
  16. What were the signatures you are referring to? I arrived in the new forum so I never saw that function. "Duh," says she, with a sudden flash of insight after reading properly instead of skimming through the posts, that would probably be a link to our personal site for self promotion purposes. :cool::cool:
  17. Yeah but unfortunately for us, it means the end user has to download and install the plug in, and if they don't because MS tells them it's dangerous then we will still have to cater for IE6 and its mess.
  18. I think it is the absolute positioning of your "splash" and the relative positioning of the "masthead"`which could be causing your problem. See this article: http://therealcrisp.xs4all.nl/meuk/IE-zindexbug.html or this one http://www.quirksmode.org/bugreports/archives/2006/01/Explorer_z_index_bug.html
  19. Isn't it funny how they think you can magically write the copy about their product or company and provide photos, all with the wave of a magic wand....
  20. Well it's still in Beta and on invitation only, so it will be a while before it takes off like all those other social networking sites. Knowing Google I'm sure they will give it enough hype to make it take off.
  21. It's still in Beta, but this is what you can do for the moment, as long as you have Contacts to experiment with. A bit like an free online meeting. I'm still a little confused myself
  22. No it didn't and I wasn't aware that opaque could be used instead of transparent. My post just briefly explains why and links to Adobe on the subject, where they only mention transparent. I just read the rest of Adobe's article and it does link to an archived tech post which explains it better http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/155/tn_15523.html
  23. Has anyone got their invitation to Google Wave yet? I just got mine today, but I don't have a lot of people showing up in Contacts, so it's going to be difficult trying it out...
  24. It works fine in Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac, your issue is with IE of course. The following should fix this problem which I had some time ago. Check out this post http://www.killersites.com/forums/topic/1822/drop-down-menu-woes/
×
×
  • Create New...