|
| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Online | User List | Help |
|
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Thread Type: Sticky Thread Total posts in this thread: 56
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Advanced Member United States Joined: Dec 19, 2007 Post Count: 1285 Status: Offline |
@Eric: The overlfow-y:scroll fix is an interesting one because it is only needed with that type of sticky footer in your example. I really don't like that horizontal scroll bug in Opera though. Ya neither do I. Each method has one negative. So I guess it's just pick your poison. When I show code examples, I like showing "one" strong method. Not - do this, but if this, then do this - that's to confusing. So I understand your position. On one hand, it's probably a bug in the webkit rendering engine, and will probably eventually be eliminated. And according to my stats, Opera has double the users as Safari. So you may just want to give a option in the code - let them test it and see which one they like. I'll keep looking for a remedy though. html { height:101%; /* or height:100%; and overflow-y:scroll; */ } ---------------------------------------- Eric :~) Knowledge is Power ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by ewwatson at Nov 12, 2008 6:56:11 AM] |
||
|
|
Advanced Member Joined: Apr 2, 2005 Post Count: 2141 Status: Offline |
If you are going to add new css codes to the default stylesheet that specifically fixes one issue for some certain browser(s) but might cause minor issue to another browser(s), then I think it would be best to add comments to those styles stating what the pros and cons are so it can be left up to the styler to keep it, modify it or remove it altogether. Otherwise, the default css as it is now is doing a super job. I only have to change a few things around only because its specific for a site. ---------------------------------------- Success is based on how much you spend. If it's not money, then the alternative is your time. The Kasper Group |
||
|
|
Advanced Member USA Joined: Mar 24, 2005 Post Count: 3000 Status: Offline |
Ok sounds good thanks for the suggestions. I'll send an update to thelma this week. there are some good changes coming down the pipeline. ---------------------------------------- "The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundings." -Okakura Kakuzo Save the developers<!> Maine Webworks |
||
|
|
Advanced Member United States Joined: Dec 19, 2007 Post Count: 1285 Status: Offline |
Doubt you'll use it - but how about this one? I have them both in mine. a { text-decoration: none; outline: 0; /* removes dotted border in FX */ } a:visited { text-decoration: none; } a:active, a:focus, a:hover { visibility: visible; /* kills IE6 a:hover bug */ text-decoration: underline; } ---------------------------------------- Eric :~) Knowledge is Power |
||
|
|
Advanced Member USA Joined: Mar 24, 2005 Post Count: 3000 Status: Offline |
Doubt you'll use it - but how about this one? I have them both in mine. a { text-decoration: none; outline: 0; /* removes dotted border in FX */ } a:visited { text-decoration: none; } a:active, a:focus, a:hover { visibility: visible; /* kills IE6 a:hover bug */ text-decoration: underline; } I think that is already in there but written slightly differently. I can add a {outline:0;} - thought the outline only occurs as the link is clicked or given :focus though. What is this one? visibility: visible; /* kills IE6 a:hover bug */ ---------------------------------------- "The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundings." -Okakura Kakuzo Save the developers<!> Maine Webworks |
||
|
|
Advanced Member United States Joined: Dec 19, 2007 Post Count: 1285 Status: Offline |
What is this one? visibility: visible; /* kills IE6 a:hover bug */ Hi John. It's this thingy. I figure it's a good thing to add and forget about. It won't harm anything and you never have to give that bug another look again. ---------------------------------------- Eric :~) Knowledge is Power ---------------------------------------- [Edit 2 times, last edit by ewwatson at Nov 14, 2008 7:47:59 PM] |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Current timezone is GMT Mar 20, 2010 8:24:27 PM |