Search options (Page 1 of 2)

Ok, so i've been around here for over 6 months; i've got 24 posts; i've given 3 times the advice in posts than i have posted for myself; i'm obviously not a robot; yet, i can't have a link to my site, even despite the fact that it's being nofollowed? But yet, other people with less posts and newer to the forum are allowed to have links? No wonder Stephan's sites are going down hill. You can delete this post --and my account.

My display is 1680x1050 . I am currently experimenting with a new design as we speak . I like full fluid layouts, but there's something wrong with this one .

I actually just finished fixing a layout issue with the drop down menu, but the acronyms is a good point too, thanx.

I rewrite urls all the time, and our WCMS/UFMS also does its own canonicalization. I actually wrote that url like that on purpose (SEO).

Yeah, i crawl other people's sites as well as our own, and you can search our index to find what we may or may not have. This is only a prototype and has a long way to go before it will become a  REAL search engine. The purpose of that project was to develop a better engine, because i see how the big engines are allowing bogus content to slip through, so as i get free time to work out algorithms, i try to get better results. Because that is so much of a "back-burner" type of project, i don't even cache results, or make a big deal of it. For now, from a user standpoint, it is nothing more than a "convenience" for the websites that happen to be allowed into the index. Hell, i don't even bother collecting search stats yet.....

The website is simple and clean, which is good, but it is not aesthetically pleasing, and you are severely suffering from a lack of SEO. Get rid of that flash menu!

I love it . It's simple, clean, soft, and friendly (everything i'm not!). The only thing that really bugged me was the lack of any style being applied to the top menu links.

I've got a tip for you: get rid of the solid white border! Lmmfao!

Both websites are identical. Other than that, they look good.

Oh wow, it looks good. But i don't understand why you put the text at the top into images, instead of plain text?

The videos show all there is to know. There is nothing in the website that is not in the videos on each feature's front page.

Also, @Im: Grid layouts will not work for a site that is as simple as this one. There just isn't enough content to need anything like that.

I'm not sure what you mean with the grid. I do agree that the google ads kind of get in the way, but i cannot think of a better way to place them. I am more worried about usability, then design, then the rest, in that order.

Thanx for your feedback, it is much appreciated.