<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[KillerSites.com Web Design Forums - What does js.path mean?]]></title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/forums/topic/2299/what-does-jspath-mean/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in What does js.path mean?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What does js.path mean?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11403/#p11403</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eddie for looking into that. I couldn&#039;t really find any info on it either. And I couldn&#039;t get it to fix anything in IE8 either. I found another (possibly prefered) workaround. Like my last similar problem, the opacity bug only comes to light when it&#039;s fading in (ie can&#039;t do both). On img tags, fancybox doesn&#039;t fade in (only if you specify it to). So I just added a img tag to the link, and that kills the bug and adds a cool effect to boot. Instead of fading in, it grows from the link. Then I just added img width zero.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Eric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11403/#p11403</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What does js.path mean?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11396/#p11396</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:<br /><a href="http://www.cerny-online.com/cerny.js/documentation/guides/configuration" rel="nofollow">http://www.cerny-online.com/cerny.js/do &#133; figuration</a></p><p>I found that link and saw many references to js.path.&nbsp; Still not sure what it means. So in reference to what I said in the first two paragraphs, I&#039;m incline to believe it has a purpose. What? I do not know.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (newseed)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11396/#p11396</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: What does js.path mean?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11395/#p11395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not uncommon to add what I call dummy extension for files that are not zipped.</p><p>Files with .js extension normally opens up in some browsers like Firefox.&nbsp; Other files like .exe, .com, .doc, .txt, etc. can tend to open or run the file instead of providing a download window.</p><p>Of course normally we would zip them. As for the .js, there isn&#039;t much to zip (555 bytes) and so supplying a .path suffice.</p><p>Now if by chance this .path extension is some kind of new zipping program, I never could find anything on the net about it.&nbsp; Reason why I mention this is because last week I received a font from someone that uses .dfont extension.&nbsp; It&#039;s some kind of font export file and it looks like it&#039;s for a Mac.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (newseed)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11395/#p11395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What does js.path mean?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11394/#p11394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>See this download. <a href="http://code.google.com/p/fancybox/issues/detail?id=39" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/fancybox/issues/detail?id=39</a> it&#039;s a supposed fix for IE8 opacity/png in combo with jQuery fade bug. But why the strange extension? Does that mean I should add it to the main JS file or other you think? I tried just adding it in a block of it&#039;s own after the plugin - didn&#039;t work.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Eric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.killersites.com/forums/post/11394/#p11394</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
