<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP vs. Ruby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/</link>
	<description>Real world talk about web design, programming and the business of web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:25:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-108819</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-108819</guid>
		<description>Hi Russel,

I am a big believer that today, PHP is the way to go for several reasons. I am not saying that Ruby and ROR don&#039;t have good things about them, it is just that PHP overall, is the better option.

You can learn more at my dedicated PHP web site: www.killerphp.com.

... You will find hours of free video tutorials and articles, as well a few opinion pieces that go into the details as to why I prefer PHP over any other web application development language today:

- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.killerphp.com/articles/will-ruby-kill-php/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Will Ruby Kill PHP&lt;/a&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.killerphp.com/articles/evangelizing-php/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PHP for Web Designers&lt;/a&gt;

... And there are a few more.

BTW, I also have a beginners site on css: www.csstutorial.net/

Hope that helps,

Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russel,</p>
<p>I am a big believer that today, PHP is the way to go for several reasons. I am not saying that Ruby and ROR don&#8217;t have good things about them, it is just that PHP overall, is the better option.</p>
<p>You can learn more at my dedicated PHP web site: <a href="http://www.killerphp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.killerphp.com</a>.</p>
<p>&#8230; You will find hours of free video tutorials and articles, as well a few opinion pieces that go into the details as to why I prefer PHP over any other web application development language today:</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.killerphp.com/articles/will-ruby-kill-php/" rel="nofollow">Will Ruby Kill PHP</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.killerphp.com/articles/evangelizing-php/" rel="nofollow">PHP for Web Designers</a></p>
<p>&#8230; And there are a few more.</p>
<p>BTW, I also have a beginners site on css: <a href="http://www.csstutorial.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.csstutorial.net/</a></p>
<p>Hope that helps,</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russel Avila</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-108789</link>
		<dc:creator>Russel Avila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-108789</guid>
		<description>Stefan,

I am currently a mechanical engineer here in my country. However my recent fascination with the developments in the web has made me decide to shift careers and try web development. I think it is very dynamic and it is exactly the kind of industry that I want. I am currently studying CSS. Dreamweaver, and XHTML and will soon study a server side programming language after trying out a couple of project websites. However I am now confused on which language to study. Ruby or PHP? Sure, PHP is currently the well documented and most popular but somehow the recent news about RoR has made me rethink on whether I should learn Ruby as my first language or go along with PHP. I hope you can give advice. (my main consideration is to learn how to build a scalable, low maintenance database driven websites as soon as possible)


Thanks a lot.

Russel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan,</p>
<p>I am currently a mechanical engineer here in my country. However my recent fascination with the developments in the web has made me decide to shift careers and try web development. I think it is very dynamic and it is exactly the kind of industry that I want. I am currently studying CSS. Dreamweaver, and XHTML and will soon study a server side programming language after trying out a couple of project websites. However I am now confused on which language to study. Ruby or PHP? Sure, PHP is currently the well documented and most popular but somehow the recent news about RoR has made me rethink on whether I should learn Ruby as my first language or go along with PHP. I hope you can give advice. (my main consideration is to learn how to build a scalable, low maintenance database driven websites as soon as possible)</p>
<p>Thanks a lot.</p>
<p>Russel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-81658</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-81658</guid>
		<description>My guess is Ruby will be to PHP what Java is to C/C++. I don&#039;t see either one dying out anytime soon, nor do I see Ruby becoming more popular than PHP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is Ruby will be to PHP what Java is to C/C++. I don&#8217;t see either one dying out anytime soon, nor do I see Ruby becoming more popular than PHP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Citti</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-45761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Citti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-45761</guid>
		<description>There is no framework for web app development in Ruby that competes with Rails in terms of popularity; Rails is the dominant framework of choice for developing web apps using the Ruby programming language (scripting language, however you want to refer to it).

PHP web development has no such dominant framework of choice.

So to answer the question above: &quot;can a PHP framework be as effective as Rails?&quot;... probably not. The PHP web developer community is not as unified around its most popular framework as the Ruby web developer community is unified around Rails.

(does anyone know which PHP framework is the most popular?)

I searched for non-rails frameworks for Ruby development and there is hardly anything - &quot;Nitro&quot; and &quot;Web Application Framework&quot; were the only 2 I could find, and I didn&#039;t get the sense that there was much buy-in. The unification behind Rails puts a lot of pressure on Rails to solve all problems and produces a momentum of evolution that cannot be matched by any PHP frameworks.

Well, these are my wild theories on the topic. I guess I&#039;m saying that the proportion of the community (Ruby devs) that is devoted to and agrees to a set of conventions (Rails) necessitates the evolution of that convention set. If tomorrow there were suddenly 20 new ruby frameworks that effectively competed with Rails, I think then &quot;Ruby&quot; would become far less threatening to PHP. As it stands, there is still a lot of php development with no framework at all, something I am sure cannot be said for Ruby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no framework for web app development in Ruby that competes with Rails in terms of popularity; Rails is the dominant framework of choice for developing web apps using the Ruby programming language (scripting language, however you want to refer to it).</p>
<p>PHP web development has no such dominant framework of choice.</p>
<p>So to answer the question above: &#8220;can a PHP framework be as effective as Rails?&#8221;&#8230; probably not. The PHP web developer community is not as unified around its most popular framework as the Ruby web developer community is unified around Rails.</p>
<p>(does anyone know which PHP framework is the most popular?)</p>
<p>I searched for non-rails frameworks for Ruby development and there is hardly anything &#8211; &#8220;Nitro&#8221; and &#8220;Web Application Framework&#8221; were the only 2 I could find, and I didn&#8217;t get the sense that there was much buy-in. The unification behind Rails puts a lot of pressure on Rails to solve all problems and produces a momentum of evolution that cannot be matched by any PHP frameworks.</p>
<p>Well, these are my wild theories on the topic. I guess I&#8217;m saying that the proportion of the community (Ruby devs) that is devoted to and agrees to a set of conventions (Rails) necessitates the evolution of that convention set. If tomorrow there were suddenly 20 new ruby frameworks that effectively competed with Rails, I think then &#8220;Ruby&#8221; would become far less threatening to PHP. As it stands, there is still a lot of php development with no framework at all, something I am sure cannot be said for Ruby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-45042</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-45042</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, the Zend framework is still actively developed. 

We actually used Zend (even in it&#039;s early stages) for a couple of social networking sites.  It wasn&#039;t complete at the time (the Zend framework) but it nonetheless proved to be valuable.

PHP has a messy legacy but it is solid, proven and widely used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, the Zend framework is still actively developed. </p>
<p>We actually used Zend (even in it&#8217;s early stages) for a couple of social networking sites.  It wasn&#8217;t complete at the time (the Zend framework) but it nonetheless proved to be valuable.</p>
<p>PHP has a messy legacy but it is solid, proven and widely used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-45013</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-45013</guid>
		<description>In the context of many other frameworks for PHP, Zend Framework never found any traction. Nor was it developed to any appreciable extent. Consequtently, it was -- and continues to be -- useless. I believe is trying to breathe life into it, but it will take some serious marketing muscle to overcome its deficiencies. The world wide web will be better off when PHP goes the way of Perl. 4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the context of many other frameworks for PHP, Zend Framework never found any traction. Nor was it developed to any appreciable extent. Consequtently, it was &#8212; and continues to be &#8212; useless. I believe is trying to breathe life into it, but it will take some serious marketing muscle to overcome its deficiencies. The world wide web will be better off when PHP goes the way of Perl. 4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web24u</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-16068</link>
		<dc:creator>web24u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-16068</guid>
		<description>I think they will both have their place. Ruby is just the niche right now. The spike in Ruby projects is for the most part (I think) because the ruby people now have a way to make web apps. I think PHP is the better option because it focuses on web development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they will both have their place. Ruby is just the niche right now. The spike in Ruby projects is for the most part (I think) because the ruby people now have a way to make web apps. I think PHP is the better option because it focuses on web development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Mischook</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Mischook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>We have found speed issues with Rails and Ruby using fastcgi and APACHE.

I put a stop on the project because I did not want to jump into trying to tweak for speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have found speed issues with Rails and Ruby using fastcgi and APACHE.</p>
<p>I put a stop on the project because I did not want to jump into trying to tweak for speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-5027</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-5027</guid>
		<description>Rails provide you with easy pre-made libraries and for accessing database but at the cost of speed. Yes I am sure you have heard this thousand times regarding developer cycle or whatever marketing that is thrown by Rails community.

Sure, everybody loves easy to use language/frameworks just like when Java was born, a lot of C++ people switched boat.

After several years of Java existence, it shifted from easy/productive to bloated. Most people these days went back to C/C++ coding for backend server. One example is www.meebo.com.

Rails itself is a framework made by 37signals people when they did their web application. Similar to Django when Lawrence-Journal developers invented it. 

These frameworks were made by them to handle their own software, which in the process of doing so, they (might) found it to be a good marketing stuff. This reminds me of Extreme Programming methodology that Kent Beck et al. tried to market when they did their Chrysler software project.

So what happened to Extreme Programming? A thing of a past, and a bag of blast from the community saying that they&#039;re just creating a religion and trying to market the methodology where in reality, it just doesn&#039;t work.

By the way, couple weeks ago I read DHH blog saying he had to code some part of their web app using C to optimize the bottleneck. This means that if you need to tweak Rails, you better know the internal code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rails provide you with easy pre-made libraries and for accessing database but at the cost of speed. Yes I am sure you have heard this thousand times regarding developer cycle or whatever marketing that is thrown by Rails community.</p>
<p>Sure, everybody loves easy to use language/frameworks just like when Java was born, a lot of C++ people switched boat.</p>
<p>After several years of Java existence, it shifted from easy/productive to bloated. Most people these days went back to C/C++ coding for backend server. One example is <a href="http://www.meebo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.meebo.com</a>.</p>
<p>Rails itself is a framework made by 37signals people when they did their web application. Similar to Django when Lawrence-Journal developers invented it. </p>
<p>These frameworks were made by them to handle their own software, which in the process of doing so, they (might) found it to be a good marketing stuff. This reminds me of Extreme Programming methodology that Kent Beck et al. tried to market when they did their Chrysler software project.</p>
<p>So what happened to Extreme Programming? A thing of a past, and a bag of blast from the community saying that they&#8217;re just creating a religion and trying to market the methodology where in reality, it just doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>By the way, couple weeks ago I read DHH blog saying he had to code some part of their web app using C to optimize the bottleneck. This means that if you need to tweak Rails, you better know the internal code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.killersites.com/blog/2006/php-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killersites.com/blog/?p=86#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>A lot of it depends upon the uptake of PHP 5 and the Zend Framework on that platform. 

I can&#039;t see medium-large size companies simply dropping the PHP mantle and running to Ruby. It would create a lot of unnecessary work for starters.

Who knows though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of it depends upon the uptake of PHP 5 and the Zend Framework on that platform. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see medium-large size companies simply dropping the PHP mantle and running to Ruby. It would create a lot of unnecessary work for starters.</p>
<p>Who knows though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
